ME BEING MAD IN COLLEGE

Below is a discussion assignment for my Fall 2026 course “Financial Success.” There are 25 students in the course. I called out 2 student’s choices (instructions are to respond to 2 others after posting your own response) and had write a disclaimer saying that I am not trying to personally attack them, but the organization they chose is dismal compared to mine. In fact, almost everybody in the class chose a for-profit instead of a nonprofit, and one of the nonprofits chosen by another student was the Girl Scouts, whom I have had some beef with over the years due to their compensation issues. However, if my child joined the Girl Scouts, I would not be mad at all. They accept transgender youth (unlike Boy Scouts), but my beef is that the CEO is paid far too much (as most CEO’s are) and their ingredients seriously suck!

A peer’s discussion post answer. My response to her is below (and no, I DID NOT USE ANY A.I.):

Only “a year” in prison. Only money. I am a bitch.

Just a bit more research on students from Hershey Boarding School (not really an orphanage anymore)

This peer has been in other courses w me and she’s actually a good person IRL. She just did not know:

Sometimes, I’m a bit blunt, but I truly mean well. It’s be-cause care. I’m guilty of consumerism all the time.

This lady is a nonprofit major along with me; her main focus is youth suicide prevention, including but not limited to IT2sLGBAQ youth and BIPOC youth.

This is the organization I chose, and no peer responded to me. Please donate to ExperienceEducate.org?

These next screenshots are from a different discussion post in the same course, discussing “Human Capital.” This is the 2nd time I took this course because I withdrew from it a year prior, due to having personal issues with other peers in the course. I was almost expelled from the course. So, I had to take it again. My blahg post “Human Capital” (also written with no A.I. at all) was typed up during the first time I took this course. However, this time around, my approach is bit more precise and blunt:

Boring, I know. I responded to this student about “human” irrationality in my post:

The person below me is the professor. Since I was late, his A.I. summary did not include my responses.

I’m pretty sure that I did not “violate” any student conduct guidelines; I am using my freedom of speech and my research-doxxing to simply have an adult debate with my peers. However, the professor disagrees.

This is why I withdrew from the course the first time. This same exact reason. No other professor has tried so hard to get me in trouble. The only other issue I had with a professor was over a year ago at the same school, and the student that the professor was trying to protect, who works for a Jewish/Isreal nonprofit, had reported me for bringing up the International Criminal Court and the International Court of Justice rulings. That assignment was about how organizations display their funding. So, the student who reported me had posted her organization’s pie chart of where their funding goes. Each color of the pie chart was a different program or operations section. When I asked the student what the section “civil defense" meant, and I cited the international court rulings, she did not respond to my comment at all- she simply reported me to the school’s 509 civil rights office, who eventually said that complaint was unfounded after I had to defend myself with evidence of the posts, and my own life’s research, including having grown up Jewish myself.

Also, I am Jew for Peace by so-called “blood” or “DNA.” I did not know a religion could be a DNA, and “Jewish blood” is the only one that is considered as DNA, because Isreal was/is and always has been in charge of the Human Genome Project (there is no Muslim or Christian DNA (but the Fellowship of Christians and Jews say Jews were/are the first Christians, which is historically correct, but which “Jews” are the first “Jews” is what the world argues about, as some argue they are actually Palestinian). If my religion was not genetically assigned to me by another country’s enforcements, a-greed by my country, and I was truly free to choose my religion (if my Freedom of Religion was truly allowed to exist), I’d simply say I re-legion to the truth of peace; not murder, not genocide, not rape, not pedophilia- just true peace.

HUMAN CAPITAL?

According to Investopedia, "human capital" is a type of "intellectual capital" that defines the value of employees' (for profit) and constituents' (non-profit) "experiences and skills," such as their investment in "education, training, intelligence, health, loyalty and punctuality." According to morale, humans are not supposed to be measured according to economic worth. However, that point is violated by human traffickers, some trade war secrets as "intangible assets," and certain prediction technologies that for example, guess life span based on habit cues, or other x/y/z+ indicators that sort of act as depreciation or amortization summaries (inadequate algorithm healthcare fraud). Astrology is a practice that kind of does this too, as it claims to predict events or people's worth/personalities, and astrologers make a profit from it as a "service" or "consultation." Then of course, the topic of being "fair trade" would denote a company truly values their human capital by paying them "fairly," while many companies that boast about their human capital are not act-u-ally using fair trade practices, or they are polluting areas that damage human/animal environmental health systems.

Certain human capital investments can be calculated as expenses, dedicated to employee retention, training, and appreciation, that can be deducted from taxable income. Examples include how much the company pays out for health benefits, training labor and materials, some production and human resources costs, and of course wages, commissions and bonuses. The Investopedia article cites a company called Skandia, that developed the first model to connect "human capital" and "structural capital" to macroeconomic trends through "intellectual capital" data points, as a sort of "knowledge flow" (similar to "cash flow"), to create "innovation capital" for "development and renewal" purposes. The company uses the model in their reporting structure, and it has been honored as leading tool to further capitalize company values and further explore their "relationship capital" connections.

Another contrary point to make is that when people sue for assault, discrimination, defamation, emotional distress and the like, a judge would eventually have to put a price on the reparative amount for the human suffering- which is sometimes between a company and person's labor or image, and involves monetary settlement and/or prison time. As mentioned, some companies give "fair" employee perks, but when it comes to sourcing materials, they don't go further to fair trade the labor of their product materials. Some companies simply use the term for marketing, and tax related benefit, valuing only some people considered employees worth recognizing (while others suffer), as less companies have proven to truly honor "human capital" as a morally serious imperative. Usually, "human rights" in comparison to "human capital," relates to nonprofit missions- but sometimes nonprofits, and more particularly the "foundations" that grant them, use exploitative and environmentally toxic practices too (a.k.a. the Nonprofit Industrial Complex).

When it comes to hostage trading in war and the Prison Industrial Complex, the idea of "human capital" works at it's most exploitative measure. More often we can find human labor trafficking exploitation (particularly of the less educated), in areas that are designated "Special Economic Zones" (SEZs), which're often dismutual borderlands, while international trade secrets are protected from any Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request, being a "protected clause" along with underground geographical maps (which hide nuclear bases and other vaults). In that, any public outsider would never be able to request information regarding those certain capital/tol protection structures, which is sometimes the root of evading accountability for some human rights, while paradoxically, is also the most potent protection for national rights (of which "human" definition(s) are at times disregarded for national capitol/tal preferences).

GIF via @Rewire.org

References:

ASEAN. 2023. "How do Special Economic Zones impact migrant workers in Thailand?" ASEAN- Australia Counter Trafficking, Australian Aid. https://www.aseanact.org/story/lpn-research/

Chen, James. 2021. "Intellectual Capital: Definition, Types, Measurement, Importance." Investopedia. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/i/intellectual_capital.asp

Fiedorczuk, Julita, Michalczuk, Grażyna. 2016. "SIGNIFICANCE OF SKANDIA ACHIEVEMENTS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF APPROACHES TO CONCEPTUALIZATION AND ASSESSMENT MODELS OF NATIONAL INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL." Optimum Economic Studies. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/314979181_Significance_of_Skandia_Achievements_in_the_Development_of_Approaches_to_Conceptualization_and_Assessment_Models_of_National_Intellectual_Capital

INCITE.org. 2004. "Beyond the Nonprofit Industrial Complex" INCITE! https://incite-national.org/beyond-the-non-profit-industrial-complex/

Kenton, Will. 2025. "What is Human Capital?" Investopedia. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/h/humancapital.asp

Landyback, Paxen. 2021. "Petition: The Definition of Fair." Care2. https://www.thepetitionsite.com/298/112/476/the-definition-of-fair/

Fairtrade.net. nd. "What is Fairtrade?" Fairtrade International. https://www.fairtrade.net/en/why-fairtrade/what-we-do/what-is-fairtrade.html

GIF via @ReeseSpecialtyFoods